Closing the fuel poverty gap: A plan for targeted energy support
Britain is still living with the aftermath of the energy crisis. While wholesale prices have eased, household energy bills remain more than £700 higher than in 2021, and millions are struggling with affordability during a wider cost of living squeeze. Around 2 million households are in arrears, and as many as 6.1 million households live in fuel poverty across the UK, as estimated by the NEA. The average fuel poverty gap has nearly doubled since 2020 and now stands at over £400 in England. Without reform, the expiry of the Warm Home Discount (WHD) in April 2026 risks leaving a cliff-edge of support for vulnerable customers.
Why change is needed
Analysis by Public First shows that low income is the strongest predictor of energy affordability challenges. Almost three quarters (72%) of households spending more than 10% of their income on energy live below the poverty line, and nearly all households in “deep fuel poverty” also fall into poverty more broadly. But income isn’t the only driver. Disabled households are almost twice as likely to face fuel poverty and pay an extra £86–£97 per year on energy, while older households (65+) and those paying by standard credit face premiums of around £100 annually. These are structural needs: households cannot simply “use less” energy to save money.
Yet current schemes miss many of those most at risk. Even after recent expansion, the WHD still excludes most disabled households and leaves out around 2.5 million fuel-poor homes, including 2.2 million who are low-income, disabled or older. The £150 payment also falls far short of today’s £400+ fuel poverty gap.
A better model for support
Public First tested three options for reform:
-
Rising block tariff – offers lower rates on initial energy use but risks raising bills for vulnerable high-use households.
-
Unit-rate discount – reduces the cost per unit of energy but is expensive and complex to align with new dynamic tariffs.
-
Payment-based discount – delivers fixed or income-linked rebates on bills, proving the most cost-effective and fair.